![]() The police interviewed witnesses, and thirteen of them were re-interviewed five months later. A thief stole guns and money, but was shot six times and died. They showed that witnesses of a real-life incident (a gun shooting outside a gun shop in Canada) had remarkable accurate memories of a stressful event involving weapons. However, a study by Yuille and Cutshall (1986) contradicts the importance of stress in influencing eyewitness memory. As witnessing a real crime is probably more stressful than taking part in an experiment, memory accuracy may well be even more affected in real life. This means that for tasks of moderate complexity (such as EWT), performance increases with stress up to an optimal point where it starts to decline.Ĭlifford and Scott (1978) found that people who saw a film of a violent attack remembered fewer of the 40 items of information about the event than a control group who saw a less stressful version. Deffenbacher (1983) reviewed 21 studies and found that the stress-performance relationship followed an inverted-U function proposed by the Yerkes-Dodson Curve (1908). 758 (1890).Anxiety or stress is almost always associated with real-life crimes of violence. Outdoor Resorts of South Carolina, Inc., 304 S.C. ![]() The provision concerning re-examination and recall of witnesses wasĪdded to the rule to make it consistent with South Carolina law. There was no provision in the federal rule as to re-examination and recall of witnesses. Subsection (c) which allows leading questions when "necessary to develop the witness' testimony." 127, 332 S.E.2d 533 (1985), is still permissible under the first sentence of The use of leading questions when examining a child, State Subsection (c) is consistent with former law. Rejects the more restrictive language of the federal rule which limits cross-examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the ![]() The scope of cross-examination is within the discretion of the trial judge. General Insulation and Acoustics, 234 S.C. Under South Carolina law, cross-examination is limited only by the requirement that the inquiry relate to matters pertinent to the issues involved or to It should be noted that Rule 614 controls the calling and interrogation of witnesses by the Trial, including the examination of witnesses, is within the sound discretion of the trial judge. ![]() It is consistent with the general rule in this State that the conduct of the The language of subsection (a) of this rule is identical to that used in the federal rule. This rule shall not limit the right of any party to recall a witness in The parties to the action, that witness may be recalled only in the discretion of the court. After the examination of the witness has been concluded by all A witness may be re-examined as to the same matters to which he testified only in the discretion of the court, but withoutĮxception he may be re-examined as to any new matter brought out during cross-examination. Identified with an adverse party, interrogation may be by leading questions. When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness Ordinarily leading questions should be permitted on cross-examination. Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness' A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility. Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) MODE AND ORDER OF INTERROGATION AND PRESENTATION
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |